Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

    • Zaloguj
    Zobacz pozycję 
    •   Strona główna Repozytorium
    • PIWet - PIB
    • Publikacje
    • Zobacz pozycję
    •   Strona główna Repozytorium
    • PIWet - PIB
    • Publikacje
    • Zobacz pozycję
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Use of glycerol triheptanoate as a marker for processed animal by-products - results from 2010–2024

    Journal of Veterinary Research

    Thumbnail
    Oglądaj/Open
    Use_of_glycerol_triheptanoate_as_a_marker_for_processed_animal_by-products_-_results_from_2010–2024.pdf (411.9KB)
    Data
    2025
    Autor
    Grelik, Aleksandra
    Kowalczyk, Ewelina
    Kwiatek, Krzysztof
    Metadane
    Pokaż pełny rekord
    Streszczenie
    Introduction: Whole dead animals, parts of dead animals, products of animal origin or other products derived from animals that are not intended for human consumption are animal by-products, and legislation imposes restrictions on the use of those which may pose a risk to the food and feed chain. High-risk products should only be used outside the feed chain. Unsafe by-products are distinguished from safe ones, parcel by parcel, and those with the highest harm potential are permanently marked during processing with glycerol triheptanoate (GTH) to prevent their entry into the feed chain. The legislated minimum content of this marker must be 250 mg/kg of fat. This research is on the development and validation of methods using gas chromatography with flame ionisation or with mass spectrometry for GTH detection, and also comprises a report of compliance with the GTH content threshold among samples of animal by-products. Material and Methods: Between 2010 and 2024, 2,303 samples of meat and bone meal, rendering fat, processed animal protein, soil improvers, antioxidants, feed materials and mixtures, dog chews, feathers, bird balls and unknown material of animal origin were tested. Gas chromatography was used with either flame ionisation detection or mass spectrometry. Results: Samples that did not meet the requirements under applicable law accounted for approximately 10.5% (240 samples). The highest percentage of non-compliant samples was recorded in the processed animal proteins group (20.7%). Incorrectly marked meat and bone meal and rendered fat accounted for 8% and 12% of their groups, respectively. Conclusion: Nearly 90% of the samples tested were correctly marked with GTH as required or free of it, which may indicate progress in developing effective marking technology at processing plants
    URI
    https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/jvetres-2025-0069
    Zbiory
    • Publikacje [716]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Przeglądaj

    Całe RepozytoriumZbiory i kolekcjeDaty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematyTa kolekcjaDaty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematy

    Moje konto

    Zaloguj

    Statystyki

    Przejrzyj statystyki użycia

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV