Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Pathogens

dc.contributor.authorCzyżewska-Dors, Ewelina
dc.contributor.authorNowak, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorZębek, Sylwia
dc.contributor.authorDors, Arkadiusz
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-01T14:10:18Z
dc.date.available2025-12-01T14:10:18Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifierhttps://dspace.piwet.pulawy.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/877
dc.identifier.issn2076-0817
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/14/12/1196
dc.description.abstractWild boar (Sus scrofa) is a widespread invasive species in Poland and may act as a reservoir for various pathogens, including those associated with the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC). As data on bacterial respiratory pathogens in wild boar populations, particularly co-infections, in Poland and other European countries remain limited, the main goal of our study was to examine the frequency of selected bacterial respiratory agents and their co-occurrence in lung samples collected from culled wild boars during hunting. Two hundred and fifty-three lung samples were analysed for the presence of genetic material of A. pleuropneumoniae, M. hyopneumoniae, M. hyorhinis, and G. parasuis. In total, 159 out of the 253 (62.8%; 95% CI: 56.6–68.8) wild boars were infected with at least one pathogen. In general, 73 (28.9%; 95% CI: 23.3–34.9) of wild boar lung samples tested positive for G. parasuis, 106 (41.9%; 95% CI: 35.7–48.2) were positive for M. hyopneumoniae, and 10 (4%; 95% CI: 1.9–7.1) were positive for M. hyorhinis. No evidence of A. pleuropneumo- niae infection was detected in any of the examined lung samples. Infection with a single pathogen was detected in 129 (51%; 95% CI: 44.6–57.3) of sampled wild boars, whereas co-occurrence of two infectious bacterial agents was revealed in 30 animals (11.9%; 95% CI: 8.1–16.5). Among single-pathogen infections, the highest positivity rate was observed for M. hyopneumoniae (31.6%; 95% CI: 25.9–37.7), whereas the most frequent co-infection involved M. hyopneumoniae and G. parasuis (9.1%; 95% CI: 5.8–13.3). This investigation indicated that wild boar in the study area are potential hosts for bacterial agents associated with PRDC. It is worth highlighting that wild boars can contribute to the maintenance and/or dissemination of bacterial pathogens to humans (especially hunters) and domestic animals, and it is essential to maintain active surveillance of these infectious agents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectwild boarsen_US
dc.subjectco-infectionsen_US
dc.subjectbacterial agentsen_US
dc.subjectPRDCen_US
dc.subjectPolanden_US
dc.titleMolecular Survey of Selected Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens in Polish Wild Boarsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitation2025 vol.14 nr 12, 1196.
dcterms.titlePathogens
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14121196


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord