Państwowy Instytut Weterynaryjny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy

    • Zaloguj
    Zobacz pozycję 
    •   Strona główna Repozytorium
    • PIWet - PIB
    • Publikacje
    • Zobacz pozycję
    •   Strona główna Repozytorium
    • PIWet - PIB
    • Publikacje
    • Zobacz pozycję
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach

    Parasite Epidemiology and Control

    Thumbnail
    Oglądaj/Open
    1-s2.0-S2405673121000064-main.pdf (343.8KB)
    Data
    2021
    Autor
    van der Giessen, Joke
    Deksne, Gunita
    Gómez-Morales, Maria
    Troell, Karin
    Gomes, Jacinto
    Sotriaki, Smaragda
    Różycki, Mirosław
    Kucsera, Istvan
    Djurković-Djaković, Olga
    Robertson, Lucy
    Metadane
    Pokaż pełny rekord
    Streszczenie
    In 2012, WHO/FAO ranked 24 foodborne parasites (FBP) using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to provide risk assessors with a basis for prioritising control of highly ranked FBP on the global level. One conclusion was that ranking may differ substantially per region. In Europe, the same methodology was used to rank FBP of relevance for Europe. Of the 24 FBP, the top-five prioritised FBP were identified for Europe as Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, and Cryptosporidium spp., all of which are zoonotic. The objective of the present study was to provide an overview of surveillance and reporting systems in Europe for these top five prioritised FBP in the human and animal populations, to identify gaps, and give recommendations for improvement. Information on the surveillance systems was collected from 35 European countries and analysed according to the five different regions. For most FBP, human surveillance is passive in most countries and regions in Europe and notification differs between countries and regions. Adequate surveillance programmes for these FBP are lacking, except for T. spiralis, which is notifiable in 34 countries with active surveillance in susceptible animals under EU directive. Although human and animal surveillance data are available for the five prioritised FBP, we identified a lack of consistency in surveillance and reporting requirements between national experts and European bodies. Recommendations for improved surveillance systems are discussed.
    URI
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405673121000064?via%3Dihub
    Zbiory
    • Publikacje [640]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Przeglądaj

    Całe RepozytoriumZbiory i kolekcjeDaty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematyTa kolekcjaDaty wydaniaAutorzyTytułyTematy

    Moje konto

    Zaloguj

    Statystyki

    Przejrzyj statystyki użycia

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Kontakt z nami | Wyślij uwagi
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV